# \#reports

**URL:** https://forum.datacebo.com/tag/reports/10.md

[Latest](https://forum.datacebo.com/latest.md) · [Categories](https://forum.datacebo.com/categories.md) · [Tags](https://forum.datacebo.com/tags.md)

---

## [Measuring significant correlations](https://forum.datacebo.com/t/measuring-significant-correlations/403)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@neha](https://forum.datacebo.com/u/neha)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [February 4, 2026, 3:51pm UTC](https://forum.datacebo.com/t/measuring-significant-correlations/403 "2026-02-04T15:51:11Z")

</div>

In our most recent release, we made an important change to the way we measure synthetic data quality. From now on, the Quality Report will evaluate whether the synthetic data matches strong correlations from the real dat…

---

## [Quality Report Timing](https://forum.datacebo.com/t/quality-report-timing/208)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@pranav.rupireddy](https://forum.datacebo.com/u/pranav.rupireddy)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [June 11, 2024, 9:47pm UTC](https://forum.datacebo.com/t/quality-report-timing/208 "2024-06-11T21:47:48Z")

</div>

I am noticing that the quality report takes a very long time (upwards of multiple days) - I was wondering if you had any suggestions to speed this up or if this could be improved?
